librephotosvsPulse
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| librephotos | Pulse | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 8 118 | 6 973 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +232 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 43 |
| Latest release | 1.5.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
librephotos and Pulse score the same (71/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for librephotos.
If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; librephotos needs more configuration.
Pulse is growing faster right now (+232 stars in 30 days).
librephotos details →Pulse details →
Swap a project
Keep librephotos, compare it with
Keep Pulse, compare it with