LibationvsQMReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | QMReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 6 375 | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +154 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 12 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Libation scores 68/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for QMReader.
Libation is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).
Libation details →QMReader details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep QMReader, compare it with