LetoReadervsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LetoReader | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Productivity | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 316 | 393 292 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 944 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 37 |
| Latest release | — | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | HTML | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 47/100 for LetoReader, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for LetoReader.
If you want the quickest setup, LetoReader is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 944 stars in 30 days).
LetoReader details →openclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep LetoReader, compare it with
Keep openclaw, compare it with