LetoReadervsOpen-WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LetoReader | Open-WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Productivity | #3 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 316 | 157 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +4 135 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 23 |
| Latest release | — | v0.12.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | HTML | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Open-WebUI scores 90/100 against 47/100 for LetoReader, so it is the safer default.
Open-WebUI ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for LetoReader.
If you want the quickest setup, LetoReader is easier to run; Open-WebUI needs more configuration.
Open-WebUI is growing faster right now (+4 135 stars in 30 days).
LetoReader details →Open-WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep LetoReader, compare it with
Keep Open-WebUI, compare it with