LanLensvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LanLens | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 146 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 45/100 for LanLens, so it is the safer default.
LanLens ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; LanLens needs more configuration.
LanLens details →Upptime details →