LanLensvsmitmproxy
Two self-hosted Network Monitoring projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LanLens | mitmproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 146 | 46 448 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 313 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 45/100 for LanLens, so it is the safer default.
LanLens ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 313 stars in 30 days).
LanLens details →mitmproxy details →All Network Monitoring projects →