mitmproxyvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| mitmproxy | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 46 448 | 17 183 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 313 | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
mitmproxy ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; mitmproxy needs more configuration.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 313 stars in 30 days).
mitmproxy details →Upptime details →