LanLensvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LanLens | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 147 | 24 064 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +786 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 45/100 for LanLens, so it is the safer default.
LanLens ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, LanLens is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+786 stars in 30 days).
LanLens details →temporal details →