LangfusevsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Langfuse | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 124 in AI | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 36 689 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 664 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 161 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.71.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Langfuse scores 86/100 against 56/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
Langfuse ships more often: 161 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; Langfuse needs more configuration.
Langfuse is growing faster right now (+1 664 stars in 30 days).
Langfuse details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep Langfuse, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with