OmniVoice-StudiovsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniVoice-Studio | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 92 781 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 840 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 840 stars in 30 days).
OmniVoice-Studio details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with