langflowvsWebCodex
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | WebCodex | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 156 109 | 2 446 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +918 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 55/100 for WebCodex, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for WebCodex.
langflow is growing faster right now (+918 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →WebCodex details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep WebCodex, compare it with