langflowvsTrenova
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | Trenova | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 2 in Fleet Management |
| GitHub stars | 156 115 | 314 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +924 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.10.5 · 13 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 41/100 for Trenova, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Trenova.
If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; Trenova needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+924 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →Trenova details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep Trenova, compare it with