langflowvstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 156 105 | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +914 | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+914 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →transfer.sh details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep transfer.sh, compare it with