hermes-agentvstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hermes-agent | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 120 in AI Assistant | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 258 015 | 15 905 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 592 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.22.5 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
hermes-agent scores 89/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.
hermes-agent ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; hermes-agent needs more configuration.
hermes-agent is growing faster right now (+9 592 stars in 30 days).
hermes-agent details →transfer.sh details →
Swap a project
Keep hermes-agent, compare it with
Keep transfer.sh, compare it with