langflowvsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 156 117 | 11 122 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +926 | +102 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.
If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+926 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →SonarQube details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep SonarQube, compare it with