langflowvsOpencast
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | Opencast | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #38 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 156 138 | 509 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +916 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | 20.5 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | ECL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 57/100 for Opencast, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Opencast.
If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; Opencast needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+916 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →Opencast details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep Opencast, compare it with