LAN-OrangutanvsNomad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LAN-Orangutan | Nomad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 1 139 | 17 049 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +80 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 19 |
| Latest release | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Nomad scores 76/100 against 58/100 for LAN-Orangutan, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for LAN-Orangutan.
If you want the quickest setup, LAN-Orangutan is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.
Nomad is growing faster right now (+80 stars in 30 days).
LAN-Orangutan details →Nomad details →