label-studiovssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| label-studio | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Data Collection | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 28 576 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +234 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.23.2 · 29 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
label-studio scores 80/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
label-studio ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
If you want the quickest setup, label-studio is easier to run; supabase-automated-self-host needs more configuration.
label-studio is growing faster right now (+234 stars in 30 days).
label-studio details →supabase-automated-self-host details →
Swap a project
Keep label-studio, compare it with
Keep supabase-automated-self-host, compare it with