supabase-automated-self-hostvsTelegraf
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| supabase-automated-self-host | Telegraf | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 506 | 17 886 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +62 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 |
| Latest release | — | v1.40.2 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Telegraf scores 78/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
Telegraf ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
If you want the quickest setup, Telegraf is easier to run; supabase-automated-self-host needs more configuration.
Telegraf is growing faster right now (+62 stars in 30 days).
supabase-automated-self-host details →Telegraf details →