Komavsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Koma | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 18 in Video Processing | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 298 | 132 689 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 234 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1463 |
| Latest release | — | b11977 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 41/100 for Koma, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1463 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Koma.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Koma needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).
Koma details →llama.cpp details →
Swap a project
Keep Koma, compare it with
Keep llama.cpp, compare it with