Kokoro FastAPIvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kokoro FastAPI | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 5 607 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +132 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 69/100 for Kokoro FastAPI, so it is the safer default.
Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.
Kokoro FastAPI details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Kokoro FastAPI, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with