Fish Speechvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 33 454 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +131 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech and woodpecker-ci score the same (73/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Fish Speech details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with