KohavsPaddleOCR
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Koha | PaddleOCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Library Management | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 596 | 91 912 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +471 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Perl | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 61/100 for Koha, so it is the safer default.
PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Koha.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; Koha needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+471 stars in 30 days).
Koha details →PaddleOCR details →
Swap a project
Keep Koha, compare it with
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with