ArchivesSpacevsPaddleOCR
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ArchivesSpace | PaddleOCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 447 | 91 926 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +485 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 8 |
| Latest release | v4.2.1 · 29 Jun 2026 | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 58/100 for ArchivesSpace, so it is the safer default.
PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ArchivesSpace.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; ArchivesSpace needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+485 stars in 30 days).
ArchivesSpace details →PaddleOCR details →
Swap a project
Keep ArchivesSpace, compare it with
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with