keycloakvsVigil365
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| keycloak | Vigil365 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Authentication | #46 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 37 583 | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +602 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 2 |
| Latest release | 26.8.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v1.1.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | C# |
Which one should you pick?
keycloak scores 86/100 against 49/100 for Vigil365, so it is the safer default.
keycloak ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Vigil365.
If you want the quickest setup, keycloak is easier to run; Vigil365 needs more configuration.
keycloak is growing faster right now (+602 stars in 30 days).
keycloak details →Vigil365 details →
Swap a project
Keep keycloak, compare it with
Keep Vigil365, compare it with