KestravsWebCodex
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kestra | WebCodex | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 30 052 | 2 446 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 736 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 59 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Kestra scores 82/100 against 55/100 for WebCodex, so it is the safer default.
Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for WebCodex.
Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 736 stars in 30 days).
Kestra details →WebCodex details →
Swap a project
Keep Kestra, compare it with
Keep WebCodex, compare it with