Kestravsstatic_status
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kestra | static_status | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 30 053 | 732 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 737 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 59 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Kestra scores 82/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.
Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.
If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; Kestra needs more configuration.
Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 737 stars in 30 days).
Kestra details →static_status details →
Swap a project
Keep Kestra, compare it with
Keep static_status, compare it with