KestravsopenHop Repeater
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kestra | openHop Repeater | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 30 053 | 298 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 737 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 59 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Kestra scores 82/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.
Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openHop Repeater.
If you want the quickest setup, Kestra is easier to run; openHop Repeater needs more configuration.
Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 737 stars in 30 days).
Kestra details →openHop Repeater details →
Swap a project
Keep Kestra, compare it with
Keep openHop Repeater, compare it with