Kestravsmetamcp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kestra | metamcp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #10 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 30 053 | 2 734 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 737 | +48 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 59 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Kestra scores 82/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.
Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.
Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 737 stars in 30 days).
Kestra details →metamcp details →
Swap a project
Keep Kestra, compare it with
Keep metamcp, compare it with