AutoGPTvsmetamcp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | metamcp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #10 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 187 805 | 2 735 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +289 | +49 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.
metamcp ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, metamcp is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+289 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →metamcp details →