Joplinvsnanote
Two self-hosted Notes & Editors projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Joplin | nanote | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #62 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 56 916 | 157 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +440 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 1 |
| Latest release | v3.7.22 · 28 Oct 2026 | 1.0.0 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Joplin scores 83/100 against 42/100 for nanote, so it is the safer default.
Joplin ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for nanote.
If you want the quickest setup, nanote is easier to run; Joplin needs more configuration.
Joplin is growing faster right now (+440 stars in 30 days).
Joplin details →nanote details →All Notes & Editors projects →
Swap a project
Keep Joplin, compare it with
Keep nanote, compare it with