jenkinsvsstatic_status
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| jenkins | static_status | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 28 in CI/CD | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 26 705 | 732 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +119 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 0 |
| Latest release | jenkins-2.580.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
jenkins scores 82/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.
jenkins ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.
If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; jenkins needs more configuration.
jenkins is growing faster right now (+119 stars in 30 days).
jenkins details →static_status details →