iTopvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| iTop | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in IT Management | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 1 213 | 118 239 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +5 880 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 11 |
| Latest release | 3.2.3-3 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 60/100 for iTop, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for iTop.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; iTop needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 880 stars in 30 days).
iTop details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep iTop, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with