IPFS Web UIvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| IPFS Web UI | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 636 | 93 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 256 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 |
| Latest release | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for IPFS Web UI.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).
IPFS Web UI details →uptime-kuma details →