IPFS Web UIvsTrilium Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| IPFS Web UI | Trilium Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 636 | 38 605 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +649 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 14 |
| Latest release | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 | v0.106.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Trilium Notes scores 83/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.
Trilium Notes ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for IPFS Web UI.
If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; Trilium Notes needs more configuration.
Trilium Notes is growing faster right now (+649 stars in 30 days).
IPFS Web UI details →Trilium Notes details →