IPFS Web UIvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| IPFS Web UI | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 636 | 95 266 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 353 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 25 |
| Latest release | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for IPFS Web UI.
If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 353 stars in 30 days).
IPFS Web UI details →Stirling-PDF details →