ADAMANT IPFS NodevsOpenWrt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ADAMANT IPFS Node | OpenWrt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 15 in File Storage | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 307 | 28 967 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +464 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenWrt is easier to run; ADAMANT IPFS Node needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+464 stars in 30 days).
ADAMANT IPFS Node details →OpenWrt details →
Swap a project
Keep ADAMANT IPFS Node, compare it with
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with