OpenWrtvsStandard Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenWrt | Standard Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Operating System | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 28 966 | 6 685 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +463 | +53 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 5 |
| Latest release | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 70/100 for Standard Notes, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenWrt is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+463 stars in 30 days).
OpenWrt details →Standard Notes details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with
Keep Standard Notes, compare it with