ADAMANT IPFS Nodevsjuicefs
Two self-hosted File Storage projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ADAMANT IPFS Node | juicefs | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 15 in File Storage | #1 of 15 in File Storage |
| GitHub stars | 307 | 14 585 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +123 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | v1.4.2 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
juicefs scores 73/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.
juicefs ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.
If you want the quickest setup, juicefs is easier to run; ADAMANT IPFS Node needs more configuration.
juicefs is growing faster right now (+123 stars in 30 days).
ADAMANT IPFS Node details →juicefs details →All File Storage projects →
Swap a project
Keep ADAMANT IPFS Node, compare it with
Keep juicefs, compare it with