InvokeAIvsQMReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| InvokeAI | QMReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Image Generation | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 28 904 | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +624 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 12 |
| Latest release | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.
InvokeAI ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for QMReader.
If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; QMReader needs more configuration.
InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+624 stars in 30 days).
InvokeAI details →QMReader details →
Swap a project
Keep InvokeAI, compare it with
Keep QMReader, compare it with