QMReadervsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QMReader | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 261 | 47 724 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.
QMReader ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; QMReader needs more configuration.
Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).
QMReader details →Text Generation WebUI details →