InvokeAIvsPulse
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| InvokeAI | Pulse | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Image Generation | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 28 899 | 6 970 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +619 | +229 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 43 |
| Latest release | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.
Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for InvokeAI.
InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+619 stars in 30 days).
InvokeAI details →Pulse details →
Swap a project
Keep InvokeAI, compare it with
Keep Pulse, compare it with