PulsevsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Pulse | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 6 970 | 47 724 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +229 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 | 10 |
| Latest release | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.
Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.
Pulse is growing faster right now (+229 stars in 30 days).
Pulse details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep Pulse, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with