InvokeAIvsPhotoMigrator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| InvokeAI | PhotoMigrator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Image Generation | #21 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 913 | 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +627 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 19 |
| Latest release | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 | v4.7.0 · 19 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 50/100 for PhotoMigrator, so it is the safer default.
PhotoMigrator ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for InvokeAI.
If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; PhotoMigrator needs more configuration.
InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+627 stars in 30 days).
InvokeAI details →PhotoMigrator details →
Swap a project
Keep InvokeAI, compare it with
Keep PhotoMigrator, compare it with