PhotoMigratorvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PhotoMigrator | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 41 in Photo Management | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 269 | 47 728 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.7.0 · 19 Sept 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 50/100 for PhotoMigrator, so it is the safer default.
PhotoMigrator ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; PhotoMigrator needs more configuration.
Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
PhotoMigrator details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep PhotoMigrator, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with