InvidiousvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Invidious | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 54 in Media Streaming | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 25 799 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 055 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.20261022.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Crystal | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Invidious scores 81/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Invidious.
Invidious is growing faster right now (+1 055 stars in 30 days).
Invidious details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep Invidious, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with