copypartyvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 47 163 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +390 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+390 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with