Invidiousvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Invidious | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 54 in Media Streaming | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 25 800 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 029 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.20261022.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Crystal | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Invidious scores 80/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
Invidious ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Invidious needs more configuration.
Invidious is growing faster right now (+1 029 stars in 30 days).
Invidious details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep Invidious, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with