InvidiousvsMikroDash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Invidious | MikroDash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 54 in Media Streaming | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 25 802 | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 031 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.20261022.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Crystal | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Invidious scores 81/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.
MikroDash ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Invidious.
If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; Invidious needs more configuration.
Invidious is growing faster right now (+1 031 stars in 30 days).
Invidious details →MikroDash details →
Swap a project
Keep Invidious, compare it with
Keep MikroDash, compare it with