imgproxyvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| imgproxy | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 13 in Image Processing | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 11 161 | 89 721 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +2 382 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 17 |
| Latest release | v4.0.20 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 72/100 for imgproxy, so it is the safer default.
imgproxy ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, imgproxy is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 382 stars in 30 days).
imgproxy details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep imgproxy, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with